Nutech2000 Infopedia

home page, index, access

COMMUNITY LAW RESOURCE GROUP

Web Sites:    http://www.clrg.info/           http://www.community-law.info/

 

The purpose of the Community Law Resource Group is to teach us, ‘we the people’, how to tell ‘THEM’ that it is VOID and stand in a ‘POSITION OF SAFETY’   We have lost sight of our rights with the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 which in effect puts our Constitutional rights ‘way out there so to speak’. Legislation is no longer tied to those fundamental rights any more. They now use a NEW FOUNDATION called the 1986 AUSTRALIA ACT which failed in a referendum and therefore void.

This in effect makes everything they do VOID as they cannot eliminate the English Law or the Australian Constitution so in effect it still stands. Making us a republic will basically take away our rights that have been hard won over a thousand years of struggle, blood and missing heads. It is vital that every Australian who is being ripped off by Camera fines for minimal km over the limit, or any sort of arbitry fine that is frivolous, unjust and not lawful, make a stand against these injustices.

 

 

 

 

GENERIC APPROACH TO THE COURT

Law can be a very complicated process. They have made it that way so that we the people generally need to hire a lawyer to act on our behalf and thus they can make lots of money.

 

In recent times our governments have found a massive revenue source by imposing fines for just about anything. The term ‘Summary’ was invented which is supposed to mean that it is not really serious as in ‘criminal’ where there is intent, a victim and complaint, but generally applies to some minor breach or regulation such as a speeding limit or regulation of standards such as driving a less than acceptable road worthy car. Quasi criminal is a term often used.  In some cases such a breach may well be a risk of injury to members of the community and we all accept that we need rules, or definitions of acceptable standards for an ordered society and such standards are in fact demanded by the community.

However our so called leaders have to a greater extent, come to decide what is good for us, rather than seeking the ‘will of the people’ and using the correct process to bring in the appropriate measures. Now we have the situation where just about everything is regulated to the hilt with often crushing penalties imposed. Often such penalties are for extremely minor breaches and this is where we the people must make a stand against the revenue raising industry which is now to the tune of over 450 million dollars in Victoria per annum.

Indeed I wonder how many people have been killed through this process by stress. I personally find it very stressful and if I were an aged person with a weak heart I can well imagine it could just be too much to handle. If a person died from a heart attack, the stress generated from the fine for some trivial matter would not be acknowledged  as the trigger I am sure.

I for one have a $700 fine for a missing rear mirror and a weather beaten, but safe trailer. Yes I would have paid  $200 to buy my freedom as most people do, but $700 is way over the line. In reality maybe a $50 fine might be appropriate if made lawful, but not $700. This is crushing for anyone in the normal life stream. So what do we do about these matters when we have our day in court.

 

 

HOW TO PLEAD

 

When you elect to go to court you have three options at the mention hearing. If you choose GUILTY the matter will be heard on that day and you can bring in your personal situation, health issues, financial etc..

 

If you choose NOT GUILTY your matter will be adjourned and you will have been granted ‘your appeal’. If you have a matter that involved a police officer, you will have the opportunity to cross examine him. It is interesting to read his oath of office. It says something to the effect of ‘keeping the peace according to law’. He of course is only taught the parliament statutes and has no idea of the REAL LAW which is the CONSITUTION.  Pulling up good folk at random on very minor matters and hitting them with huge crushing fines is not keeping the peace in my book.

 

However if you are like me, you would much prefer to avoid that and have the matter dealt with on the mention day and get it over with once and for all. There is another plea option and that is ‘NO PLEA’. It is here that we need to focus our attention very carefully. We need a strategy that will not hold us in contempt and add to the fines even more, so our approach and attitude and demeanor is of vital importance.

 

When you stand in court the matters will be read out to you and you will be asked ‘How say you, do you plead guilty or not guilty?’

 

Then the ball is in your court and you might say: Sir I do not wish to make a plea to this matter but wish to establish the jurisdiction of this court.

In fact you may even get a chance to get this in before the matter is put to you for a plea. Just be ready.

 

Now the contest of wit begins: It is all very will for those with a photographic memory who can instantly recall dozens of case references and find references instantly from a pile of books on the table, but for we, the ordinary sods dragged kicking into this theatre, it is very scary and intimidating and we can be easily thrown off our argument or quickly become extremely confused and then maybe wilt.

We then may be given an option to plead guilty and pay the fines without the added fees or some inducement which we fall for, to just to get the hell out of there. Been there done that. Just quoting the imperial acts ”all fines are illegal etc’ is like water on a ducks back so we need a bullet proof strategy to put the Magistrate and the prosecutor on the back foot very quickly and not get bogged down in legal argument that is out or our depth. So what do we really need to know to put up a reasonable fight against what we know in our hearts is very wrong, that is the question?.

 

A NO PLEA  means we want to establish the jurisdiction of the court. The court is defined in the Constitution chapter 3, and thus we want the Magistrate to define his court.

 

The court needs to establish its jurisdiction to hear any matter regarding the conviction of a subject of Her Majesty according to Const s. 71 Judicial power of the courts created by the parliament invested with federal jurisdiction.  Anything else is not valid.

 

The Prosecution needs to establish how it can go about bringing a charge against a subject of Her Majesty on Commonwealth roads using State laws and regulations that are inconsistent with Commonwealth laws.
.
PROOF OF INTENT TO COMMIT AN ACT

 

***The Prosecution needs  to establish mens rae on your behalf against the public good.

In other words where is your criminal intent?. Of course in summary matters, no INTENT is required. It is simply a breach of something that is defined by the state and therefore you must pay, so says the CORPORATE STATE.

 

The first thing you need to do is to understand WHO WE ARE. We are defined as SUBJECTS to Her Majesty and yes, she still in Queen of Australia. We are

 

SOVEREIGN SUBJECTS as defined in the Constitution.  

 

The 1947 CITIZEN ACT  is void as any alteration to the Constitution to replace the word ‘subject’ with the word ‘citizen’, must be done by referendum ( Sect128)   

 

So we have now established that we are a sovereign Subject and now we can claim the protection of the Constitution as a flesh and blood Human Being rather than being dealt with as a CORPORATE ENTITY BY A COPRPORATE COURT.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

THREE VITAL BOOKS WE NEED TO HAVE ON HAND – Available from Information Victoria 505 Lt Collins St Melbourne Phone:1300 366 356 

 

1-     THE  COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION and maybe the annotated notes on the Constitution  QUICK AND GARREN,. You can down load that from the web if you want to get really serious. However in a court you need all original copies. Web downloads will not do.

2-      1901 ACTS INTEPRETATION ACT  

3-      JUDICURY ACT 1903

 

THESE THREE BOOKS ARE THE FOUNDATION LAW FOR AUSTRALIA All law/legislation, ACTS and punishable regulations in Australia, ( STATE AND FEDERAL)  must not conflict with this law.

 

This book is also a must

 

IMPERIAL ACTS APPLICATION ACT 1980 – This is the English law, Magna Cata, enshrined into Victorian law. Inside the front cover it states that it can be used in a Court of Law in Victoria. It contains our favourite quote as to fines without conviction being void

 

 

 

OTHER SUGGESTED REFERENCE MATERIAL

 

-AUSTRALIA – THE CONCEALED COLONY – It HAS THE 1986 AUASTRALIA ACT

-1986  AUSTRALIA ACT

-VICTORIAN CONSTITUTION 1975

-TRADE PRACTICES ACT

 

 

 

 

SEPARATION OF POWERS

The constitution lays out the separation of powers and lays out government.

The Parliament makes the Bills and then they go to the State Governor or Governor General to be ENACTED on behalf of the Queen and become law.

 

Today’s Acts begin with the words ‘The Parliament of Victoria enacts as follows’ OR ‘The Governor in Council makes the following Regulations..’ and it is argued that the Victorian Parliament is acting as a sovereign in its own right but they say the Act has the Governor’s accent so it still has Royal Assent in their view. It has been changed in the name of plain English from ‘Be it enacted by the Queen’s Most Excellent majesty….” It is difficult for a lay person to really know where things stand and one reason why it is so easy to become confused.

 ——————————————————————————————-

 

Four Cases to make the CONSTITUTION CLEAR TO YOU

 

FOUR CASES

 

To understand the Australian Constitution it is only necessary to read and understand four High Court Cases with a peek at a fifth.

 

CASE 1:  is here: The King V Kidman which states that the six Justice streams from the King through the States became one only at federation in 1901. http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=495

 

 Case 2:established the “Kable Principle” which states that states cannot then subdivide that Justice stream by local Legislation. http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=225

 

Case 3: Is the extract from the pape decision on the 7th July 2008, where the High Court confirmed S 15A Acts Interpretation Act 1901 ( Cth) automatically voids any law made contrary to the Australian Constitution. http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=203

 

Case 4: is Lane V Morrison which states that an Officer cannot be a court, and defines courts to include all Parliaments, and any gathering in the name of the sovereign, who in Australia is Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second. http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=503

 

If you read and understand these all the rest of the law becomes understandable and certain. The Fifth case is extracted in The Judicial Process and is a quote from Lionel Murphy in Metwally in 1984 shortly before his untimely death.

___________________________________________________________________

 

THE ROYAL PREOGATIVE  HALSBURY LAWS OF ENGLAND 3rd ED Vol 8

Constitutional Law

 

(3) The Crown in relation to the law

(i)                  The Crown is the source of all jurisdiction

 

943 – SOVERIGN as the source of all justice, by virtue of the prerogative the sovereign is the source and fountain of justice and all jurisdiction derives from her, hence in legal contemplation the sovereign’s majesty is deemed always to be present in court

( thus her picture should always be in the court and has been removed. Note on the county court Melb. they have used the tarot card symbol)

…..AND statutes confirmed the liberties of the subject, the Sovereign is bound to cause Law and Justice in Mercy to be administered in all judgments.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

It seems that the Parliament has attempted to remove our access to the Royal Prerogative but is void.

 

WHAT TO DO WHEN CONFRONTED WITH A DEMAND ie: Infringement notice

 

  1. Write and ask why you are referred to in CAPITAL letters so that you can establish the entities as defined in BLACKS LAW

 

Capitus Deminitteo – Name in capital letters takes you out of Common Law Jurisdiction and into Roman law

 

Common law  – Innocent til proven Guilty – the Constitution

Roman Law -  Need to prove your Innocence – Statutes

 

-You need to establish that you will take no responsibility for your corporate name in Capital Letters.   DO NOT CENSENT  Since they have corporatised virtually all of Australia including the STATES, Police forces, services and so on, The big con is that silence is inferred as consent. Unless you voice OBJECTION, consent is granted by you. Therefore it behoves each one of us to get involved in our democracy such as we have it. Letters and mandates do make a difference. At this time we see a trend to Islamisation and Sharia law. Do nothing and we are consenting. Is that what we want?

 

-ROVOKE their claim – the system does have a problem filing these matters and is generally filed under Revocation.

 

-Point out our OBLIGATIONS under the Constitution that applies to everyone and the inconsistencies in Law.

—————————————————————————————————–

Const s. 109 INCONSISTENCY OF LAWS:  When the Law of a State is inconsistent with the Commonwealth, the later will prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid. ie:VOID. 

 

INCONSISTENT  LAW is to be treated as void. AIA s 15

——————————————————————————————————-

 

-Usually they will ignore any letters of Law and eventually you will be summoned to court.

 

-In the summons it will be sited as a SUMARY offence siting a section of the

a-ROAD SAFETY ( Vehicles) REGULATIONS 2009

b-ROAD SAFETY (Rules ) REGULATIONS

c-LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT  1989  etc.

 

Now you need to write up the reasons why the site quoted from any of these books is void. That is a big task and advised you study the July Lecture by Darryl O’Bryan from which these notes are taken and following lectures for more insights. This should be a working document as there will be plenty of room for improvement and expansion to assist all those who whish to make a stand for the Constitutional Law and assert their Freedom.

DVD’s available from www.clrg.info and www.nutech2000.com

__________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

WHEN YOU GO TO COURT: Go early and meet with the Prosecutor and inform him that you are attending as a SUBJECT of HER MAJESTY and that you will ask the court to declare its Jurisdiction. Generally the Cop won’t have a clue what you are talking about. If a minor matter it may be dropped there if you are lucky.

 

 

 

 

POINTS TO CONSIDER:

The imperial acts cannot be repealed by any state but they choose to ignore them

 

CONSTITUTION ACT 1975   sect 3 Laws of England to be applied in the administration of justice.  Therefore the Imperial acts are valid even by this act.

 

The Act was passed late at night illegally as anything to do with the Constitution, State or Federal must be passed by Referendum.

_______________________________________________________________

1-ROAD RULES 1999 

2-ROAD SAFETY (Vehicle) Regs 2009 

3-LOCAL GOV ACT

 

Enacting words begin: ‘The Governor in Council makes the following Regulations…’:

 

The Enacting words should be: ‘Be it enacted by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty…’

 

To use anything else indicates a blurring of the separation of powers and not compliant with AIA ( Acts Interpretation Act)  1901 sect 15a.

 

-Every act shall be read and construed subject to the constitution…..

_________________________________________________________________

-The AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 ( the new foundation for AUSTRALIAN LAW) has separated the CROWN and broken it up. The CROWN is indivisible and is for the COMMONWEALTH in total.

-The Act was signed by the Queen on the top right corner which means she has only witnessed it. She has NOT given it her Authority.

-         1984 Referendum failed: Question 2 referred to Interchange of Powers between State and Commonwealth. 

-         The people did NOT allow the Powers of the State to Equalise with the Commonwealth. The Parliaments have ignored this and passed the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 in total contradiction to the wishes of the PEOPLE.

 

They are now DEEMING to be SOVEREIGN PARLIAMENTS

 

- A member of Parliament does not take his/her Sovereignty into the parliament as the Member. The Member is a Re-Presentative of the ELECTORATE and is obligated to implement the WILL of the ELECTORATE. Therefore any Bill that is not approved by the people must be brought into question. In Quick and Garren the PEOPLE are to regard any such legislation as ‘repugnant’ and have a duty to disobey it.

—————————————————————————————————

Challenging the magistrates court Act 1989

 

Ask the Magistrate to ignore sect 100 ii of the 1989 Magistrates court act.

This defines the extent of his jurisdiction that he relies on.

-“The court does not have any jurisdiction in any cause of action with respect to or imposed on our personal body, by or under any Royal Prerogative or any statute… ”

 

Royal Prerogative is any thing to do with English law and the Commonwealth Constitution is a statute. 

 

Here is a clear example of extreme mischief where it is saying the court is out side the laws of England and need have no regard to our Constitutional rights and is in total CONTRADICTION to our Constitutional rights.  AIA 1901 sect 15 

A clear admission that it is a STAR CHAMBER or an OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENT. A clear breakdown in the SEPARATION OF POWERS. Star Chambers were forbidden in law in 1640

 

 

 

Sect 3 of the Supreme Court Procedure Act NSW 1900

-         ‘IN ANY ACTION there must be CONSENT FROM BOTH PARTIES..’

 

 

SECT 118 allows this to apply to Victoria

 

 

Trade Practices ACT Sect 2b Cannot force fees by any government body that is now a shop’ ie: Corporitised entity.

 

VITAL – ESTABLISH THE JURISDICTION YOU ARE IN

 

It is fundamental that you establish that the arena you are in to argue with your neighbour COMPLIES WITH THE LAW otherwise they will railroad you on prima-facie evidence.

 

WARNING: If you are required to sign forms on the entry of the court, it is entering you into another jurisdiction ie the CORPORATE jurisdiction. Don’t sign unless you make it clear it is under duress. Note it to that effect.  Use upper and lower case letters in writing your name as a flesh and blood human being under the Constitutional law.

—————————————————————————————————-

Const s 109 – INCONSISTANCY OF LAWS – …When the Law of a State is inconsistent with the Commonwealth, the later will prevail and to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.

 

Const  s 106 – The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution, continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth…..

 

Const s 114States may not raise forces. Taxation of property of Commonwealth or State. -  “A State shall not….raise….any tax on property of any kind belonging to the Commonwealth.….” 

 

***This statement knocks out all Rates imposed by councils and Land tax claims. 

 

The State Government or Federal Governments cannot change the Constitution except by the method laid out in Chapter 8 of the Constitution s 128. Lately we hear that we will have a referendum to include Local Councils. Wonder why?

 

Their claims are vexatious, frivolous and ill conceived.

 

 

Send article as PDF to Create PDF

Send article as PDF to PDF Printer

Send article as PDF to PDF Download

James Delingpole

James Delingpole is a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything. He is the author of numerous fantastically entertaining books including Welcome To Obamaland: I’ve Seen Your Future And It Doesn’t Work, How To Be Right, and the Coward series of WWII adventure novels. His website is www.jamesdelingpole.com.



US physics professor: ‘Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life’

By James Delingpole Politics Last updated: October 9th, 2010

1528 Comments Comment on this article

Newton: "Fie on you, Hansen, Mann, Jones et al! You are not worthy of the name scientists! May the pox consume your shrivelled peterkins!"

Newton: “Fie on you, Hansen, Mann, Jones et al! You are not worthy of the name scientists! May the pox consume your shrivelled peterkins!”


Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Here is his letter of resignation to Curtis G. Callan Jr, Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society.

Anthony Watts describes it thus:   This is an important moment in science history. I would describe it as a letter on the scale of Martin Luther, nailing his 95 theses to the Wittenburg church door. It is worthy of repeating this letter in entirety on every blog that discusses science. It’s so utterly damning that I’m going to run it in full without further comment. (H/T GWPF, Richard Brearley).

 

 

Dear Curt:
When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?

How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For example:

 

1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate

 

2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.

 

3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work.

 

4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open.

 

5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a poll on the members’ interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment. You did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten more expressions of interest.) There was of course no such petition or proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.) The entire purpose of this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our petition to the Council.

 

6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition.

APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization?

I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question.

I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer represents me, but I hope we are still friends.
Hal



Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chmn of Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President’s Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety
Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW II; books: Technological Risk (about, surprise, technological risk) and Why Flip a Coin (about decision making)

Send article as PDF to PDF Download

IDEA:   Why don’t we pool our resources and send a rep over there skilled in the art of electrics from our groups  and with the talents necessary to come home and teach it to the groups here.Melbourne, Adelaide and Byron Bay.  Can we  raise about $2500 to do that?  Would be great if we can.
I have sent this note to ASTRO in SA and the Byron Energy groups. Putting all our resources together should get some one competent there.
Do we have any nominations as to who should go? Perhaps someone who has already immersed them selves in the Bedini and electric car Technology would be appropriate and I know some folk from the Byron bay group and ASTRO would be appropriate.
Can you get back to me if you think this a good idea and how we can make it happen.
Thanks   Ian
Secretary for Association for Climate Technology Solutions


For more information, and attendance availability, please go to this link:

http://r-charge.com/Nov2010.html 

DEAR UPDATE SUBSCRIBER,

Well, it’s been about a month since the last Update.  I’d like to wish a warm welcome to all of the new people who signed up for this service during that time.  If you are interested, you can find all of my previous Update Newsletters on the Newsletter Archive page of my website:

http://www.free-energy.ws/newsletter-archive.html

This is a SPECIAL ADDITION of this Newsletter to announce a Special Event.  On November 13th and 14th of this year (only 5 weeks from now) Renaissance Charge, LLC is hosting a Conference and Workshop in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.  For the first time in over 20 years, John Bedini will be present at a public event, and will host a “Big Surprise” for the attendees.  The main event will be the unveiling of the new line of Battery Chargers developed by John Bedini, and marketed by Renaissance Charge and Tesla Chargers. 

Each person coming to the event will be given a “Kit Motor” to take home, included in the price of admission.  Part of the workshop time will be used to build some of these kits, so everyone can see how it is done and ask all the questions they can think of.  The large 10 and 30 coil units will be demonstrated, including a charging system for an electric car.

On the second day of the event, I will be giving a presentation titled: Electric Motor Secrets, Part 2.  There, I will explain EVERYTHING I KNOW about how Back EMF functions in electric motors, how it masks the real efficiency of these machines, and how to overcome it, even in CONVENTIONAL MOTORS.  I will also lay out the complete design characteristics of “The Lockridge Device” which was a fully self-running machine.

Jeff Wilson will demonstrate his replications of John Bedini’s “Tesla Switch”, as well as his automated “Battery Swapper” system for recycling power.  Gordy Ormesher will also talk about his Electric Vehicle Association and electric vehicle conversions in the Idaho Panhandle.

Aaron Murakami, author of The Quantum Key, will be there, as well as Jeane Manning, author of Break Through Power!  This event has “the best of the best” from the Pacific Northwest. All in all, it’s a “Once in a Life-time Event”.

 

For more information, and attendance availability, please go to this link:

http://r-charge.com/Nov2010.html 

 

Cost is just $250 for the two days, and that includes a Kit Motor AND lunch on both days. Admission will be limited to 500, so sign up and book your hotel room as soon as you can!

Well, that’s all for now.  Thanks for caring about energy issues and I hope to see you next month at the Conference!

Warm regards,

Peter Lindemann, DSc   © Copyright 2010 Clear Tech, Inc. PO Box 713 Liberty Lake, WA  99019 509-921-6960

 www.free-energy.ws drl@free-energy.ws



Send article as PDF to PDF Creator

CLICK FOR ORIGINAL LINK AND PAY GATEWAY

A Convention giving People a chance to spend time at the Shop with
John Bedini and others of like-mind in actual Assembly and
Discussion of Cutting Edge Alternative Energy Technology.

Focus is on:

* The most Practical and Efficient Alternative Energy Solutions,
* The Theory behind it,
* Quality Workshop building of such systems,
* How to Convert your Vehicle to 100% Electric and keep your Batteries.

Location: Coeur D’Alene Resort http://www.cdaresort.com See Tour of Resort

Date: Weekend of November 13th and 14.

Registration: 8-8:15AM Nov. 13th. Limit of 500 persons.

Cost: $250 person. $50 each for child 12 and under with adult (limit two). Send to:

Renaissance Charge, LLC
10183 N Aero Dr. Ste 3
Hayden, ID 83835

Or pay with credit card: Buy Now

CDA Hotel Group Rate booking: Use Event name Renaissance: 1-800-688-5253

Prices from $99-$149 for limited time.

Airport: Spokane International 45 minutes away. CDA Resort provides transport.

Featuring: The Renaissance Battery Chargers; with the New Tesla Solar Tracker III the new Renaissance Industrial Rejuvenator, and the new EV Chargers.

The Bedini Monopole Energizers and

Bedini/Cole Magnetic Window Motor Energizers;

Electric Vehicle Conversions.

Speakers:

Rick Friedrich, Renaissance Charge, LLC. Main speaker and Instructor.

Subjects: Introductions, Renaissance Products, R&D, Online Group Forums, Small and Large Motor Generator Kit Assembly Direction, Electric Vehicle Conversions and Charging, Commercial and Homepower Application of Bedini Technology in Large 10 and 30 Coil Monopole.

John Bedini, Energenx, Inc. Special Guest, Rare Appearance of Legendary Inventor.

Subjects: General Overseeing of Discussions and Programs, Questions and Answers throughout Convention, Commercial and Homepower Application of Bedini Technology, Overview of the Big Surprise Event.

Peter A. Lindemann, Clear Tech, Inc.

Subject: “Electric Motor Secrets, Part 2″. Peter is going to explain EVERYTHING he knows about how and why Back EMF functions in electric motors, how it masks the real efficiency of these machines, and how to overcome it, even in CONVENTIONAL MOTORS. He is also going to lay out the complete design characteristics of “The Lockridge Device”, which is a fully self-running machine. Questions and Answers throughout Convention. Assisting Peter is Aaron Murakami, of Energetic Forum.

Jeff Wilson (‘Bits’), MachineOfTime1

Subject: Demonstrating the Battery Swapper and Tesla Switch, Homepower Application of Bedini Technology.

Gordy Ormesher, Panhandle Electric Vehicle Association.

Subject: Electric Vehicle Conversion Assembly and Benefits, Overview of the record-breaking Renaissance Porsche Conversion.

Jeane Manning, changingpower.net

Other speakers will be added when confirmed.

Conference Schedule: Subject to change

Saturday Nov. 13th

8-8:15AM Registration

8-8:15AM Viewing of Energizers and Chargers

8:15-10AM Introductions, Misc. speakers: Rick Friedrich, Gordy Ormesher.

10-10:15AM Coffee break/Q&A

10:15-Noon Building of kits

Noon-1:15 Lunch break

1:15-2:30PM Finishing off kits/Questions & Answers

2:30-2:45 Coffee break/Q&A

2:45-5:30PM Main Event Group Project/Q&A

5:30-6PM Viewing of Energizers and Chargers.

Sunday Nov. 14th

8-8:15AM Viewing of Energizers and Chargers.

8:15-10AM Misc. Speakers: Rick Friedrich, Peter Lindemann, Jeff Wilson.

10-10:15AM Coffee break/Q&A

10:15-Noon Main Event Group Project/Q&A

Noon-1:15 Lunch break

1:15-2:30PM Main Event Group Project/Q&A

2:30-2:45 Coffee break/Q&A

2:45-5:30PM Main Event Group Project/Q&A

5:30-6PM Viewing of Energizers and Chargers.

More Details:

The CDA Resort is downtown so there are plenty of restaurants and things to do. For details you can visit their website at http://www.cdaresort.com

Besides having “the world’s most Romantic” Spa, the Resort has two nice restaurants: Dockside on the main floor, and Beverly’s 5 Star restaurant on the 7th floor. You may also want to try Cedar’s floating restaurant on the lake a few miles away. Many restaurants in the area and other buildings like the resort are owned by Hagadone. There is a nice lounge with a warm fireplace and piano at the Resort.

The cost is $250 per person. This includes 2 full days at the conference as well as a new take home Energizer kit. Lunch served both days. Also included is the discount on hotel rates. Hotels usually provide pickup from the airport as well. All money received will go to the convention, kit parts given out, and costs to make it happen.

There will be a few other companies displaying products. The local Panhandle Electric Vehicle Association (PEVA) will be present and Gordy will speak for an hour. A few other companies have asked to come. Send us an email if you are interested and have a relevant business potentialtec@yahoo.com

The feedback we get from people is that they all want to visit the Bedini shop and spend time with us. This is no longer possible for several reasons. So this workshop gives people a chance to spend time with us and others of like-mind in actual building. We want to make it as flexible and informal as people want it. A lot more question and answer time, as well as building and experimenting. We will have the 30 coiler monopole energizer there and several other motors. We will even have a record-breaking 100% electric vehicle Porsche displayed.

The plan for the two days is outlined as follows:
Allow for several speakers to talk for an hour or two while giving people opportunity to look at the motors and chargers we have on display. We will spend some time talking about our companies, products, upcoming products and direction. Have groups build for around 3 hours, maybe 4 people per group, work on a new monopole kit. This gives us an opportunity to work together hands on and discuss all relevant building questions. We did this unorganized in NY last year. We will have everything ready for each group to build one instead of having everyone build one at the same time.

Then we will have the big event where we either finish up putting together the 30 coiler or spend most of the time running it with the optional generator coils outputting to an AC load, and other bigger motors with questions and answering. There will also be a Big surprise event.

To pay, send $250 to:
Renaissance Charge, LLC.
10183 N Aero Dr. Ste 3
Hayden, ID 83835

Rick Friedrich
General Manager
Renaissance Charge, LLC.
208-772-4514

eXTReMe Tracker

Send article as PDF to Create PDF

I am outraged at this police torture. There is up to seven cops who can hand cuff him at any time. This is unacceptable and an out rage. All those present must be punished to the full extent of the law for torture.

Send article as PDF to Create PDF

Welcome to USH2.com View/Edit Cart |  CONTACT US: support =at= knowledgepublications (dot) com
Imagine walking through your house and feeling nice warm air lofting over your body.  Air as warm as sunshine because that is where it comes from.  You made the solar heater yourself in an afternoon with simple wood, glass, paint, screws and caulking.  It went into your window as easy as an air conditioner.  It looks great on the outside of your house and your neighbors think its a awesome idea.  You put them in the early fall and take them out in the late spring.  No holes cut in your house, nothing on the roof, no building permits, no contractors.  This is solar heating at its easiest and finest.  East side windows give heat in the morning, south side windows give heat all day and west side window give heat in the late afternoon and evenings.  Every piece of sunshine that strikes your solar air heater is natural gas or heating oil that you do not need to pay for.  This is the smart way to start with solar.

These easy to follow DIY instructions on these in-window solar heaters are in the book, The Complete Handbook of Solar Air Heating Systems and I have it on s.ale until Sunday at
http://www.USH2.com/sept2010sale.htm

It gets even better because you did NOT have to pay for the glass.  Sunshine to Dollars, the famous best selling book by Steven Harris shows you how to get all of the glass for f.ree to make the solar heaters.   Its as easy as calling up some local companies, in every single city in the USA, and asking them to save some glass for you rather than throwing it in the dumpster.  Sunshine to Dollars is sitting at the top of the page, just under the above book, at
http://www.USH2.com/sept2010sale.htm That page will be active till the end of Sunday, October 10th, 2010

You’re one of my loyal customers, and I want you to be able to get this before I get flooded with Popular Science Magazine People customers.  I even have a combo price for you to get these at a severe discount.  I only have 45 of these books in stock right now, I have another batch on the way before my ad is placed in Popular Science on Oct 12th, 2010, and then I expect to be very busy and I don’t want you to have to wait a week or so and get a back ordered while we print more.

Its fall right now, now is the time to make your solar heaters and to have the warm satisfaction of solar air heating your house and you.  Your cat will love it as well.  Get this done now before it gets much colder.  You can do it, this is very DIY and hands on easy.

All my best,

Steven Harris
CEO www.USH2.com

Send article as PDF to PDF Printer



Al Gore’s Nine Lies Written by Investor’s Business Daily | 24 February 2010 newsweek gore The godfather of climate hysteria is in hiding as another of his wild claims unravels — this one about global warming causing seas to swallow us up. We’ve not seen or heard much of the former vice president, Oscar winner and Nobel Prize recipient recently as the case for disastrous man-made climate change collapses. Perhaps he’s off reading how scientists were forced to withdraw a study on a projected sea level rise due to global warming after finding two “technical” mistakes that undermined the findings. The study, published in 2009 in Nature Geoscience, allegedly confirmed the conclusions of the 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that sea levels would rise due to climate change. The IPCC put the rise at 59 centimeters by 2100. The Nature Geoscience study put it at up to 82 centimeters. Many considered the study and the IPCC’s estimates too conservative in their warnings. After all, Al Gore, in his award-winning opus, “An Inconvenient Truth,” laughingly called a documentary, foretold an apocalyptic vision of the devastation caused by a 20-foot rise in sea levels due to melting polar ice caps “in the near future.” Now Mark Siddall, from the Earth Sciences Department at England’s University of Bristol, has formally retracted the study. “One mistake was a miscalculation; the other was not to allow fully for temperature change over the past 2,000 years,” he said. According to Siddall, “People make mistakes, and mistakes happen in science.” They seem to be happening a lot lately, and more than just mistakes. We are talking about outright fraud, the deliberate manipulation and destruction of data. Last November, Al Gore was hailed by Newsweek as “The Thinking Man’s Thinking Man.” Since then we and he have been given much to think about, starting with the damning e-mails from researchers associated with the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Britain. The e-mails revealed an organized attempt to “hide the decline” in global temperatures, to manipulate data to fit preconceived conclusions, and to discredit and shun reputable skeptics. A key finding of the IPCC, which along with Al Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, was revealed last month to be utterly bogus. The IPCC claimed glaciers in the Himalayas would likely disappear by 2035. The only thing they had to back it up was a 1999 non-peer reviewed article in an Indian mass-market science magazine. It’s been revealed that researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have been systematically eliminating weather stations, with a clear bias toward removing colder latitude and altitude locations. The number of reporting stations in Canada dropped from 600 to 35, with only one station used by the NOAA as a temperature gauge for Canadian territory above the Arctic Circle. The past is prologue. Two years ago, Justice Michael Burton of London’s High Court ruled Gore’s film could be shown in British schools only if material explaining its errors were included in the curriculum. Burton documented nine significant errors in Gore’s film and wrote that some of Gore’s claims arose from “alarmism and exaggeration.” The first error Gore made, according to Burton, was in his apocalyptic vision of the devastation caused by a rise in sea levels caused by melting polar ice caps. Burton wrote that Gore’s predicted 20-foot rise could occur “only after, and over, millennia” and to suggest otherwise “is not in line with the scientific consensus.” One by one, Gore’s prophecies of doom and those of the climate charlatans he inspired are being exposed as the work of con artists. From the CRU to the IPCC, the climate dominoes are falling one by one. His silence speaks volumes. Goodnight, Mr. Gore, wherever you are. Source

Send article as PDF to PDF Download

This DVD is the most convincing on a technical level that the 9-11 event must have been an inside job simply because the buildings were wired for demolition. Many forget that WTC7 also went down at around 5pm and it was even admitted that it was ‘PULLED’ie: deliberately demolished. The evidence is overwhelming, so why do we still propagate the worlds biggest lie? Sooner or later those involved in the job will speak out. We see the Iranian leader just today speaking out that it was an inside job. They are speaking the truth in this case and they are made out to be the villains on so many fronts. Makes you wonder who the real villains really are.
It is important to know the truth and hold those accountable for this terror that is now being inflicted on the world. It also warns us to be very wary of any pronouncements coming from government sources and one special topic of interest is Climate Change, previously known as ‘Global Warning’. Already that is falling into a black hole of scientific fraud and hoaxes.
If you would like a copy of this DVD please contact Nutech2000 at nutech@tpg.com.au

Send article as PDF to PDF Creator
Powered by WordPress Web Design by SRS Solutions © 2012 Nutech2000 Infopedia Design by SRS Solutions