We have found much the same situation here in Australia regarding tax. See www.clrg.info for the Australian situation.

I have had the “money masters” video /dvd in my collection for years. Good to see it in full in google. Please watch it as you may begin to understand what is realy going on in the world’s financial system ans who is really driving it. An absolutely profound

 

MY DAY IN COURT OCT 22 2010

A few things to be learned from my experience

I prepared a lot of paper work and got doctor’s letters etc but all evidence is verbal in the Magistrates Court so you need to line up your verbal evidence if you have witnesses or want to submit other evidence.

 

I arrived early and sought out the prosecutor for a pre conference and stood in the queue with about 5 in front of me for 3 hours solid. During that time I spoke to a young lady in the cue and heard her story where her car stalled with a jerk and she had loosened her seat belt a bit, but a cop was nearby and he approached and instead of offering her assistance he booked her for not wearing a belt. She had previously given a ‘NO PLEA” as she instinctively felt it was wrong as the police were lying. This was her second mention day and she was in the line to try and have the matter concluded. They kept telling her to fill out forms and kept adjourning the matter. I am not sure how it ended for her. It is time some pressure was put on the cops to remember they are our protectors and not there to just raise massive revenue.

 

Finally it was my turn around 12 midday and I explained I was not happy with the altered photo in the charges and other errors but the police have absolutely no interest in any broader issues except the charges on the charge sheet, so any peripheral issues, forget it. He has tunnel vision and is a brute. He has to be, in that job. He spent over an hour with the couple in front of me so I guess he was trying to help them in some way.

After attempting to have the matter dismissed on the integrity issues of the charges and health matters, he asked if there was anything else and I said “well, there are constitutional issues”. Then he replied “Oh, Your one of those”  So I guess we are making our mark down there at the court. So he filled out the paper and used all the words about the court being invalid without any prompting from me. I took the paper up stairs and after some discussion I signed it with my upper and lower case name followed by all rights reserved. As if they would care. A date for a 2 hour constitutional hearing was now set for February. I thought, What have I done? Will Darryl sit behind me??

I was then instructed to go down stairs and wait for the matter to be called on for the adjournment.  I was thinking I can’t hack this matter to be hanging over me for more months and wondered how the court could hear a case about it self, being invalid.

I thought I would put that to the Magistrate and was wondering how I can still have this matter finished today. A friend of the court came up to me for a chat and we had an exchange and she warned about letting costs accrue. She has seen some very bad situations develop. Indeed if the matter went to the Supreme court it would be easy to loose the house, so I am not sure how we use this knowledge to bring about change.

 

So my name is called and in I go to into a very cozy court room where I used to work and felt quite at home. (previous life a court recorder)  I admitted my name without saying “I am a subject to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, with all rights reserved” which I had been rehearsing all morning but I quickly stated that I felt I was being ‘drawn into a vortex of despair’ and that my only application was to have the matter struck out on health grounds and problems with the charges. I said I had been studying the constitutional issues and I had found massive problems with the system, but I could not run a Geoffrey Robinson campaign in the court system, but better to try out side the courts. He then offered me the proposition that he would dismiss the charges without penalty based on a sect 71 of some act, and knowing what he would do, would I accept a recorded guilty.  I said “I guess the system has to score its points and I was willing to make that trade”.

I also suggested I am 58 ( soon to be) and that I would like to draw on some credit of a long life without blemish. He confirmed that I had been a good boy.

The Prosecutor then read the charges and when he got to the point where he said I did not have a flag on the load, I interrupted and said I want to dispute that and showed the Magistrate  the photos. The police photo had been doctored and I could see amazement from the bench. I said I had no idea why on earth a policeman would do such a thing and I was not even charged on that matter?.

So after the charges were read he said “You need not worry about it any more. Case dismissed. You are free to go”. As he got up I said thank you sir for restoring some confidence in the system. There were a few smiles around but the prosecutor said he wished he could say the same.

 

So for me it is a great relief and it is a ‘sort of win’, bar the guilty record. Not sure about demerit points? They have to have their bit of the deal.   Fair enough I guess. I must say the Magistrate’s behavior was exemplary. Had I thought of it I would have invited him to the Community Law Resource Group meeting for a debate on points of law.  Might be an idea….

 

 

Hindsight: It would have been good not to yield to the guilty trade, but stress levels were high and to hear the offer of, Case dismissed without penalty were the key words I wanted to hear, so I did not want to jeopardize that offer. Tightness in the chest is the body saying enough is enough. However I could have pushed it just a little bit further by pushing the integrity of the charges issue. For a police officer to alter the photo and base a statement on that photo in the brief, even though I was not charged on that point, is still pretty shonky stuff, so I should have pushed my luck a little further and proposed that on this basis I should not have to make the trade for guilty. I think I just might have been able to achieve that. The Magistrate seemed to be in a generous mood but it was one o’clock and lunch time. 

It was also an opportunity to perhaps, in three paragraphs point out the constitutional issues of the invalid court scenario, but then I would risk loosing the offer and end up with another hearing that could cost me.

PRE CONFERENCE: It seems that if you go for the pre conference with the prosecutor, he is happy to put you down for a constitutional hearing and that will lead to the Supreme Court, so unless you have a 100k to spend, forget it.

On the other hand, if I had just gone in the court room in the normal process, I could have then declared myself and a subject of her majesty Q. II with all rights reserved and sought to establish the jurisdiction of the court and see what they come up with. I get the impression that their strategy now, is to simply offer a constitutional hearing for 2 hours and if you blow that, you will pay the costs. If you win, you will be on the way to the Supreme Court and bankruptcy, so I guess they have us checkmated.

 I think it would be a good idea to set up a blog site called something like injustice.org or something like that and get on the radio and invite the public to record their injustices  which should be in the tens of thousands and maybe use a getup strategy to bring about change.

Darryl has said that people like Jon Fayne 774 radio, wont air these constitutional conflicts with current law but it would be good, on air, to challenge him to a radio public debate or with any lawyer of his choosing. Put him, or other opinion makers like him on the line, but it has to be a public strategy and this way it can really hit the fan if our logic and arguments are a winner, but unless we create a movement in the tens of thousands we will be just a little maverick group and only and itch to the system.

There is no doubt the police culture needs to be improved where the public is regarded as easy prey. They should be reminded of their oath of office and  purpose for their existence. That is, our protectors and servants. Somehow they need to differentiate between ordinary decent folk and the scum they often have to deal with. They seem to be confused on this issue and may the a result of the stressful job they do. I do know some out standing police officers who have a wonderful attitude of service to the community so I do know such folk exist. Perhaps too rarely.

 

The courts should be full of criminals, not ordinary folk having their lives messed up by thousands of frivolous money grabs which are often based on a lie such as the young lady I spoke to in the queue at the court. This must be cleaned up as it is obviously pandemic.

Unless we the people do something about it with extreme public pressure, nothing will change. With a state election coming, it is a good time to get pen to paper and put them on notice.

There is plenty of scope for all of us to throw around ideas and we should do so.

The trouble is it takes time and energy and few are prepared to make the effort. The culture I often see in our various groups is: ”What can I take from the group for my self? Rather than, how can I contribute to the groups cause?”

Can we change that and make a difference?

COMMUNITY LAW RESOURCE GROUP

Web Sites:    http://www.clrg.info/           http://www.community-law.info/

 

The purpose of the Community Law Resource Group is to teach us, ‘we the people’, how to tell ‘THEM’ that it is VOID and stand in a ‘POSITION OF SAFETY’   We have lost sight of our rights with the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 which in effect puts our Constitutional rights ‘way out there so to speak’. Legislation is no longer tied to those fundamental rights any more. They now use a NEW FOUNDATION called the 1986 AUSTRALIA ACT which failed in a referendum and therefore void.

This in effect makes everything they do VOID as they cannot eliminate the English Law or the Australian Constitution so in effect it still stands. Making us a republic will basically take away our rights that have been hard won over a thousand years of struggle, blood and missing heads. It is vital that every Australian who is being ripped off by Camera fines for minimal km over the limit, or any sort of arbitry fine that is frivolous, unjust and not lawful, make a stand against these injustices.

 

 

 

 

GENERIC APPROACH TO THE COURT

Law can be a very complicated process. They have made it that way so that we the people generally need to hire a lawyer to act on our behalf and thus they can make lots of money.

 

In recent times our governments have found a massive revenue source by imposing fines for just about anything. The term ‘Summary’ was invented which is supposed to mean that it is not really serious as in ‘criminal’ where there is intent, a victim and complaint, but generally applies to some minor breach or regulation such as a speeding limit or regulation of standards such as driving a less than acceptable road worthy car. Quasi criminal is a term often used.  In some cases such a breach may well be a risk of injury to members of the community and we all accept that we need rules, or definitions of acceptable standards for an ordered society and such standards are in fact demanded by the community.

However our so called leaders have to a greater extent, come to decide what is good for us, rather than seeking the ‘will of the people’ and using the correct process to bring in the appropriate measures. Now we have the situation where just about everything is regulated to the hilt with often crushing penalties imposed. Often such penalties are for extremely minor breaches and this is where we the people must make a stand against the revenue raising industry which is now to the tune of over 450 million dollars in Victoria per annum.

Indeed I wonder how many people have been killed through this process by stress. I personally find it very stressful and if I were an aged person with a weak heart I can well imagine it could just be too much to handle. If a person died from a heart attack, the stress generated from the fine for some trivial matter would not be acknowledged  as the trigger I am sure.

I for one have a $700 fine for a missing rear mirror and a weather beaten, but safe trailer. Yes I would have paid  $200 to buy my freedom as most people do, but $700 is way over the line. In reality maybe a $50 fine might be appropriate if made lawful, but not $700. This is crushing for anyone in the normal life stream. So what do we do about these matters when we have our day in court.

 

 

HOW TO PLEAD

 

When you elect to go to court you have three options at the mention hearing. If you choose GUILTY the matter will be heard on that day and you can bring in your personal situation, health issues, financial etc..

 

If you choose NOT GUILTY your matter will be adjourned and you will have been granted ‘your appeal’. If you have a matter that involved a police officer, you will have the opportunity to cross examine him. It is interesting to read his oath of office. It says something to the effect of ‘keeping the peace according to law’. He of course is only taught the parliament statutes and has no idea of the REAL LAW which is the CONSITUTION.  Pulling up good folk at random on very minor matters and hitting them with huge crushing fines is not keeping the peace in my book.

 

However if you are like me, you would much prefer to avoid that and have the matter dealt with on the mention day and get it over with once and for all. There is another plea option and that is ‘NO PLEA’. It is here that we need to focus our attention very carefully. We need a strategy that will not hold us in contempt and add to the fines even more, so our approach and attitude and demeanor is of vital importance.

 

When you stand in court the matters will be read out to you and you will be asked ‘How say you, do you plead guilty or not guilty?’

 

Then the ball is in your court and you might say: Sir I do not wish to make a plea to this matter but wish to establish the jurisdiction of this court.

In fact you may even get a chance to get this in before the matter is put to you for a plea. Just be ready.

 

Now the contest of wit begins: It is all very will for those with a photographic memory who can instantly recall dozens of case references and find references instantly from a pile of books on the table, but for we, the ordinary sods dragged kicking into this theatre, it is very scary and intimidating and we can be easily thrown off our argument or quickly become extremely confused and then maybe wilt.

We then may be given an option to plead guilty and pay the fines without the added fees or some inducement which we fall for, to just to get the hell out of there. Been there done that. Just quoting the imperial acts ”all fines are illegal etc’ is like water on a ducks back so we need a bullet proof strategy to put the Magistrate and the prosecutor on the back foot very quickly and not get bogged down in legal argument that is out or our depth. So what do we really need to know to put up a reasonable fight against what we know in our hearts is very wrong, that is the question?.

 

A NO PLEA  means we want to establish the jurisdiction of the court. The court is defined in the Constitution chapter 3, and thus we want the Magistrate to define his court.

 

The court needs to establish its jurisdiction to hear any matter regarding the conviction of a subject of Her Majesty according to Const s. 71 Judicial power of the courts created by the parliament invested with federal jurisdiction.  Anything else is not valid.

 

The Prosecution needs to establish how it can go about bringing a charge against a subject of Her Majesty on Commonwealth roads using State laws and regulations that are inconsistent with Commonwealth laws.
.
PROOF OF INTENT TO COMMIT AN ACT

 

***The Prosecution needs  to establish mens rae on your behalf against the public good.

In other words where is your criminal intent?. Of course in summary matters, no INTENT is required. It is simply a breach of something that is defined by the state and therefore you must pay, so says the CORPORATE STATE.

 

The first thing you need to do is to understand WHO WE ARE. We are defined as SUBJECTS to Her Majesty and yes, she still in Queen of Australia. We are

 

SOVEREIGN SUBJECTS as defined in the Constitution.  

 

The 1947 CITIZEN ACT  is void as any alteration to the Constitution to replace the word ‘subject’ with the word ‘citizen’, must be done by referendum ( Sect128)   

 

So we have now established that we are a sovereign Subject and now we can claim the protection of the Constitution as a flesh and blood Human Being rather than being dealt with as a CORPORATE ENTITY BY A COPRPORATE COURT.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

THREE VITAL BOOKS WE NEED TO HAVE ON HAND – Available from Information Victoria 505 Lt Collins St Melbourne Phone:1300 366 356 

 

1-     THE  COMMONWEALTH CONSTITUTION and maybe the annotated notes on the Constitution  QUICK AND GARREN,. You can down load that from the web if you want to get really serious. However in a court you need all original copies. Web downloads will not do.

2-      1901 ACTS INTEPRETATION ACT  

3-      JUDICURY ACT 1903

 

THESE THREE BOOKS ARE THE FOUNDATION LAW FOR AUSTRALIA All law/legislation, ACTS and punishable regulations in Australia, ( STATE AND FEDERAL)  must not conflict with this law.

 

This book is also a must

 

IMPERIAL ACTS APPLICATION ACT 1980 – This is the English law, Magna Cata, enshrined into Victorian law. Inside the front cover it states that it can be used in a Court of Law in Victoria. It contains our favourite quote as to fines without conviction being void

 

 

 

OTHER SUGGESTED REFERENCE MATERIAL

 

-AUSTRALIA – THE CONCEALED COLONY – It HAS THE 1986 AUASTRALIA ACT

-1986  AUSTRALIA ACT

-VICTORIAN CONSTITUTION 1975

-TRADE PRACTICES ACT

 

 

 

 

SEPARATION OF POWERS

The constitution lays out the separation of powers and lays out government.

The Parliament makes the Bills and then they go to the State Governor or Governor General to be ENACTED on behalf of the Queen and become law.

 

Today’s Acts begin with the words ‘The Parliament of Victoria enacts as follows’ OR ‘The Governor in Council makes the following Regulations..’ and it is argued that the Victorian Parliament is acting as a sovereign in its own right but they say the Act has the Governor’s accent so it still has Royal Assent in their view. It has been changed in the name of plain English from ‘Be it enacted by the Queen’s Most Excellent majesty….” It is difficult for a lay person to really know where things stand and one reason why it is so easy to become confused.

 ——————————————————————————————-

 

Four Cases to make the CONSTITUTION CLEAR TO YOU

 

FOUR CASES

 

To understand the Australian Constitution it is only necessary to read and understand four High Court Cases with a peek at a fifth.

 

CASE 1:  is here: The King V Kidman which states that the six Justice streams from the King through the States became one only at federation in 1901. http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=495

 

 Case 2:established the “Kable Principle” which states that states cannot then subdivide that Justice stream by local Legislation. http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=225

 

Case 3: Is the extract from the pape decision on the 7^th July 2008, where the High Court confirmed S 15A Acts Interpretation Act 1901 ( Cth) automatically voids any law made contrary to the Australian Constitution. http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=203

 

Case 4: is Lane V Morrison which states that an Officer cannot be a court, and defines courts to include all Parliaments, and any gathering in the name of the sovereign, who in Australia is Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second. http://www.community-law.info/?page_id=503

 

If you read and understand these all the rest of the law becomes understandable and certain. The Fifth case is extracted in The Judicial Process and is a quote from Lionel Murphy in Metwally in 1984 shortly before his untimely death.

___________________________________________________________________

 

THE ROYAL PREOGATIVE  HALSBURY LAWS OF ENGLAND 3^rd ED Vol 8

Constitutional Law

 

(3) The Crown in relation to the law

(i)                  The Crown is the source of all jurisdiction

 

943 – SOVERIGN as the source of all justice, by virtue of the prerogative the sovereign is the source and fountain of justice and all jurisdiction derives from her, hence in legal contemplation the sovereign’s majesty is deemed always to be present in court

( thus her picture should always be in the court and has been removed. Note on the county court Melb. they have used the tarot card symbol)

…..AND statutes confirmed the liberties of the subject, the Sovereign is bound to cause Law and Justice in Mercy to be administered in all judgments.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

It seems that the Parliament has attempted to remove our access to the Royal Prerogative but is void.

 

WHAT TO DO WHEN CONFRONTED WITH A DEMAND ie: Infringement notice

 

1. Write and ask why you are referred to in CAPITAL letters so that you can establish the entities as defined in BLACKS LAW

 

Capitus Deminitteo – Name in capital letters takes you out of Common Law Jurisdiction and into Roman law

 

Common law  – Innocent til proven Guilty – the Constitution

Roman Law -  Need to prove your Innocence – Statutes

 

-You need to establish that you will take no responsibility for your corporate name in Capital Letters.   DO NOT CENSENT  Since they have corporatised virtually all of Australia including the STATES, Police forces, services and so on, The big con is that silence is inferred as consent. Unless you voice OBJECTION, consent is granted by you. Therefore it behoves each one of us to get involved in our democracy such as we have it. Letters and mandates do make a difference. At this time we see a trend to Islamisation and Sharia law. Do nothing and we are consenting. Is that what we want?

 

-ROVOKE their claim – the system does have a problem filing these matters and is generally filed under Revocation.

 

-Point out our OBLIGATIONS under the Constitution that applies to everyone and the inconsistencies in Law.

—————————————————————————————————–

Const s. 109 INCONSISTENCY OF LAWS:  When the Law of a State is inconsistent with the Commonwealth, the later will prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid. ie:VOID. 

 

INCONSISTENT  LAW is to be treated as void. AIA s 15

——————————————————————————————————-

 

-Usually they will ignore any letters of Law and eventually you will be summoned to court.

 

-In the summons it will be sited as a SUMARY offence siting a section of the

a-ROAD SAFETY ( Vehicles) REGULATIONS 2009

b-ROAD SAFETY (Rules ) REGULATIONS

c-LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT  1989  etc.

 

Now you need to write up the reasons why the site quoted from any of these books is void. That is a big task and advised you study the July Lecture by Darryl O’Bryan from which these notes are taken and following lectures for more insights. This should be a working document as there will be plenty of room for improvement and expansion to assist all those who whish to make a stand for the Constitutional Law and assert their Freedom.

DVD’s available from www.clrg.info and www.nutech2000.com

__________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

 

WHEN YOU GO TO COURT: Go early and meet with the Prosecutor and inform him that you are attending as a SUBJECT of HER MAJESTY and that you will ask the court to declare its Jurisdiction. Generally the Cop won’t have a clue what you are talking about. If a minor matter it may be dropped there if you are lucky.

 

 

 

 

POINTS TO CONSIDER:

The imperial acts cannot be repealed by any state but they choose to ignore them

 

CONSTITUTION ACT 1975   sect 3 Laws of England to be applied in the administration of justice.  Therefore the Imperial acts are valid even by this act.

 

The Act was passed late at night illegally as anything to do with the Constitution, State or Federal must be passed by Referendum.

_______________________________________________________________

1-ROAD RULES 1999 

2-ROAD SAFETY (Vehicle) Regs 2009 

3-LOCAL GOV ACT

 

Enacting words begin: ‘The Governor in Council makes the following Regulations…’:

 

The Enacting words should be: ‘Be it enacted by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty…’

 

To use anything else indicates a blurring of the separation of powers and not compliant with AIA ( Acts Interpretation Act)  1901 sect 15a.

 

-Every act shall be read and construed subject to the constitution…..

_________________________________________________________________

-The AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 ( the new foundation for AUSTRALIAN LAW) has separated the CROWN and broken it up. The CROWN is indivisible and is for the COMMONWEALTH in total.

-The Act was signed by the Queen on the top right corner which means she has only witnessed it. She has NOT given it her Authority.

-         1984 Referendum failed: Question 2 referred to Interchange of Powers between State and Commonwealth. 

-         The people did NOT allow the Powers of the State to Equalise with the Commonwealth. The Parliaments have ignored this and passed the AUSTRALIA ACT 1986 in total contradiction to the wishes of the PEOPLE.

 

They are now DEEMING to be SOVEREIGN PARLIAMENTS

 

- A member of Parliament does not take his/her Sovereignty into the parliament as the Member. The Member is a Re-Presentative of the ELECTORATE and is obligated to implement the WILL of the ELECTORATE. Therefore any Bill that is not approved by the people must be brought into question. In Quick and Garren the PEOPLE are to regard any such legislation as ‘repugnant’ and have a duty to disobey it.

—————————————————————————————————

Challenging the magistrates court Act 1989

 

Ask the Magistrate to ignore sect 100 ii of the 1989 Magistrates court act.

This defines the extent of his jurisdiction that he relies on.

-“The court does not have any jurisdiction in any cause of action with respect to or imposed on our personal body, by or under any Royal Prerogative or any statute… ”

 

Royal Prerogative is any thing to do with English law and the Commonwealth Constitution is a statute. 

 

Here is a clear example of extreme mischief where it is saying the court is out side the laws of England and need have no regard to our Constitutional rights and is in total CONTRADICTION to our Constitutional rights.  AIA 1901 sect 15 

A clear admission that it is a STAR CHAMBER or an OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENT. A clear breakdown in the SEPARATION OF POWERS. Star Chambers were forbidden in law in 1640

 

 

 

Sect 3 of the Supreme Court Procedure Act NSW 1900

-         ‘IN ANY ACTION there must be CONSENT FROM BOTH PARTIES..’

 

 

SECT 118 allows this to apply to Victoria

 

 

Trade Practices ACT Sect 2b Cannot force fees by any government body that is now a shop’ ie: Corporitised entity.

 

VITAL – ESTABLISH THE JURISDICTION YOU ARE IN

 

It is fundamental that you establish that the arena you are in to argue with your neighbour COMPLIES WITH THE LAW otherwise they will railroad you on prima-facie evidence.

 

WARNING: If you are required to sign forms on the entry of the court, it is entering you into another jurisdiction ie the CORPORATE jurisdiction. Don’t sign unless you make it clear it is under duress. Note it to that effect.  Use upper and lower case letters in writing your name as a flesh and blood human being under the Constitutional law.

—————————————————————————————————-

Const s 109 – INCONSISTANCY OF LAWS – …When the Law of a State is inconsistent with the Commonwealth, the later will prevail and to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.

 

Const  s 106 – The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution, continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth…..

 

Const s 114 – States may not raise forces. Taxation of property of Commonwealth or State. -  “A State shall not….raise….any tax on property of any kind belonging to the Commonwealth.….” 

 

***This statement knocks out all Rates imposed by councils and Land tax claims. 

 

The State Government or Federal Governments cannot change the Constitution except by the method laid out in Chapter 8 of the Constitution s 128. Lately we hear that we will have a referendum to include Local Councils. Wonder why?

 

Their claims are vexatious, frivolous and ill conceived.

 

 

I am outraged at this police torture. There is up to seven cops who can hand cuff him at any time. This is unacceptable and an out rage. All those present must be punished to the full extent of the law for torture.

This DVD is the most convincing on a technical level that the 9-11 event must have been an inside job simply because the buildings were wired for demolition. Many forget that WTC7 also went down at around 5pm and it was even admitted that it was ‘PULLED’ie: deliberately demolished. The evidence is overwhelming, so why do we still propagate the worlds biggest lie? Sooner or later those involved in the job will speak out. We see the Iranian leader just today speaking out that it was an inside job. They are speaking the truth in this case and they are made out to be the villains on so many fronts. Makes you wonder who the real villains really are.
It is important to know the truth and hold those accountable for this terror that is now being inflicted on the world. It also warns us to be very wary of any pronouncements coming from government sources and one special topic of interest is Climate Change, previously known as ‘Global Warning’. Already that is falling into a black hole of scientific fraud and hoaxes.
If you would like a copy of this DVD please contact Nutech2000 at nutech@tpg.com.au

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED?

It is a sorry day for BP and the world to see the terrible calamity now occurring. I highly recommend you watch the following video clips as they seem to be the best available in giving us an in depth understanding of what really happened.  Once again it was avoidable if only the greed factor was kept at bay and proper procedures were followed to insure safety for all. As in the Space Shuttle it boils down to a seal that was damaged and a decision to ignore it plus other short cut procedures that set up this operation for failure.

Lindsay williams is worth a listen to, but may be abit of over reaction as to the gas effects. However that will depend on how long this saga lasts. A volcano puts out far worse so we need to keep it in context.

I like the suggestion to use a biological approach to clean up the mess. This may well be the only viable option but I hear nothing about it even though it has been used in prior spills very successfully.

 

Here is a good suggestion for possible clean up. So far I have not heard it discussed but it will be the only viable way.

 

 

 

LISTEN TO ALEX JONES AND LINDSEY WILLIAMS

 

A word from the oil rigger: (edited version)

 

Friends,
If you’ve received this with my name at the bottom, it’s because you’re someone I trust. You may feel free to forward this or use this as you wish…. And for those who know me personally, I cannot stand silent, it’s not in me, and I’m not wired that way. This is long, for that I can’t apologize, it’s complex, and with the impact it’s having, and will continue to have for decades, it deserves some thoroughness. There are some thoughts around real solutions in the final section, but it’s important to understand the background of something to understand to get to real solutions…..

It is difficult to know where to begin, I am in the middle of this, and get very few breathers from it, but it’s best to start at the beginning, at what happened, then proceed to why it happened and on to how people can help, and what they can do that will provide real solutions in the long term. I am inundated daily with e-mails of all stripes and varieties, receive phone calls and text messages that completely fill my inbox on the phone within the first 24 hours of my going back offshore, and I realize that people are being assaulted hourly with media and it’s hard to separate out fact from fiction.

There will be some facts and figures here, they are accurate, and some technical terms, I will try to keep those to a minimum, but they are important, and I ask you not to skip over them.

First as to the what happened. By now, someone would have to have been living in a monastery to not know that the BP Transocean Rig went down some 45+ days ago, killing 11 men, and leaving a damaged drill pipe on the ocean floor of the Gulf of Mexico, this is a 4″ wellbore pipe, open to a depth of 18,000 feet, on top of a reservoir that was estimated to contain enough oil for it to continue to pump for 30 years. The real calculated flow right now, after 5 failed attempts to cap it is 33,250 gallons per hour.

Here’s how it happened:
What I’m providing are three links to a 60 minutes interview a Part 1, a Part 2, and a Part 3 for those of you who haven’t seen it, with an ET (Electronic Technician) on the Deepwater Horizon, and is the most accurate of the “what happened”. This interview is the best I’ve seen yet creating clarity and discernment around what occurred. Hopefully some of it will be a little clearer

What the interview tells, and I’ll boil it down is that:
(a) the BOP (Blowout Preventer) was damaged, damaged beyond the ability to control a blowout, and that damage, and the extent of it was known to the men who worked on the rig, and their bosses 4 weeks beforehand. The accumulator (basically a gasket, like a faucet spigot gasket,) had been pummelled into pieces and was coming back up in pieces, in the mud, due a drill operator’s pushing a drillhead straight through it. The decision was made by the bosses to continue to run it the way it was, since “they’d had gas pocket well control problems before, and nothing happened then”. The men who worked on the rig continued to run it, since their boss told them to, and they wouldn’t push back on that decision.
(b) One of the control pods, (there are two) on the BOP was not damaged, it was downright non-functional and broken, and again, this was known, but the decision was made to continue to run it “since the job was behind, and BP was losing money”.
(c) The night of the disaster, Halliburton’s Well Completion crew had only put two cement plugs in place. Before taking off a well, three have to be in place, to put redundant plugs in place, but again, “the job was behind, and BP had lost $25 million on well.”
(d) The entire original problem was caused by pushing the drill too fast and fracturing the well pocket, allowing too many pockets for gas to come up from. The Transocean and BP “company men” (translates to “managers”) made the decision to push the machinery beyond it’s limits since they’d lost the first well and “were losing money and time, and it was behind schedule”. The morning before the disaster, in the morning community meeting, the BP representative and the Transocean rep, and the tool pusher (the person in charge of drilling) had a very loud, aggressive argument about the best way to proceed that day. The BP rep won, with the Transocean rep and tool pusher “reluctantly agreeing”.
(1) The high pressure hydraulic pressure unit that operates the BOP was damaged, and full functional control of it was lost, there were cut lines and leaks somewhere in the unit, not allowing it to reach pressure necessary to put enough force behind the rams to cut the pipes.
(2) A full two hours before the blowout, the charts that are run at the remote operations center in Houston showed that the well was out of control, enough time to shut down drilling, shut down electrical equipment preventing the explosion and save every life. The decision was made to push on.
(3) A full 15 minutes before the explosion, the tool push and Transocean rep left the rig floor and headed down to the mud room. The men who worked in the mud shack were screaming, the pits were overflowing out of control with mud, indicating that more mud was coming back up the pipe being pushed by gas, than was being put in it.

In other words, in my own opinion, those 11 men were murdered, and the entire spill was caused by stupidity, greed and not caring at all about consequences by just 3 men, and an entire crew of 100+ going along with that decision.

I don’t often talk about the specifics of what I do out there, and I think many of you assume that I’m an xxxxxxxxxxx on a rig. Not so.
What I started out to do, and what I was hired to do, was to design, devise and deploy standardized Preventive Maintenance and Predictive Maintenance programs for large rotating equipment; turbines, generators, compressors, pumps, cranes; my specialty for 20 years with XXXX XXXXX XXXXXXX. That evolved rapidly.
Over the last 3 years, as XXXXX XXX XXX (not BP, I contract with another company) got more deeply involved in what they considered a “maintenance program”, it what evolved into a program that looks at, and redesigns every procedure and process on an oil platform and drilling operation, to absolutely, 100% guarantee that nothing can happen from a Safety, Health, Environmental or Operational standpoint. I won’t go into the details of it, but it does involve an entire culture change, and very different retraining into a different mindset, but it can be done. Everyone, and I mean everyone who works out there, that I’m associated with, is acutely and deeply aware of the consequences of every movement, every action, 24 hours a day. It is, in best description, absolutely a life and a job that very few people are aware of the real facts. You are completely dependent on the people around you, everyone one of them, making absolutely the right move, every time, every day, every minute, 24 hours a day and vice versa for their relationship with you. There are no insignificant people, or actions, on a platform. Every little thing counts. All of us, even the galley and catering staff, can operate a survival capsule, fight a fire, operate emergency equipment. Every last one of us is aware of the impact and implications of what we do.

Now let’s talk about the why of it’s happening, which is very, very different than the how. The why is simple, and it’s a point that many, many people are missing.

So, for the enlightenment and benefit of everyone let’s do some facts & figures (courtesy of Dick Gibson) -
– America has 5% of the world’s population. It consumes 27% of the world’s oil production, and a full, whopping 45% of the world’s gasoline production. That’s more than all the countries of the European Union combined. China and India do not come anywhere near us in consumption or usage.
– America consumes an average of 8,980,000 barrels, that’s 8.9 million, of gasoline (not oil, gasoline, bear with me, it’s a relevant point) daily. That’s ignoring jet fuel, home heating oil, diesel fuel, asphalt, plastics and everything else that uses crude oil as it’s base material.
– With a population of 306,000,000, this works out 1.22 gallons per day for every person, every single, last, living person, young, old, car owner, non-car owner, drivers license or not.
– That’s 446 gallons of gasoline, per year, per person. Again, every last, single, living human being in the United States.
– In terms of crude oil, the base for gasoline, and all the other substances listed above, America consumes 20, 680,000 barrels per day. That’s 20 million barrels per day, every day, day in and day out.
– There are 42 gallons of crude oil in one barrel of oil. That breaks down to 19 1/2 gallons of gasoline, 9 gallons of fuel oil, 4 gallons of jet fuel, and 11 gallons of other products including hydraulic and lube oil, kerosene, asphalts and the feedstocks for plastics (all plastic uses crude oil feedstock grains as it’s base; anything you own or use that is plastic came from crude oil). Now the mathematically astute amongst you will notice that the total comes out to more than 42 gallons, in fact it equates to about 44 gallons. This is called processing gain, and it happens in refining processes when the hydrogen and carbon bonds are broken in molecules and there is a corresponding increase in volume.
– What this other little tidbit tells us is that every living person, every soul in America, if we do the math, is responsible, personally, for around 200 barrels a year in the “other products”, especially plastics; cell phones, laptops, drinking water bottles, Tupperware, baggies, Ziploc bags, and other plastic containers.

What it comes down to when you do the math is that everyone, due to using averages, everyone, no matter who you are, is presently, at current usage rates responsible for about 600 barrels a year of crude oil in personal consumption.

Now, truly I do understand that in this society today, very few people really know where things come from, or what the base materials and raw construction are, but the bottom line of why this happened is simple, and it involves the complicit guilt of every single person living here in the United States. It wouldn’t have happened, not all, if the demand for it wasn’t there, and demand is economic, not verbal. Economics, the purchases we all make everyday are the engine that drives it, and the engine that drove this horrific episode. In strictly personal opinion, anyone that cannot look at themselves and see their own part in it is in complete denial.

Now as to what’s happening now. Let me say, I believe, from being there, from seeing it, that BP’s response has been pathetic, horrendously pathetic. Now, let me qualify that, Before I take off on ripping them, and what people can do, let me go to technicals one more time. The technical side of capping the well, plugging the pipe, stopping the leak is tremendously complicated. The unfortunate part of robot cameras and 24 hour a day media coverage makes it seem much closer than it really is. I suppose I ought to relate it to something that I think everyone can relate. At your nearest Taco Bell, while you’ve been standing at the counter, there’s the little water filled thingy that you put quarters or dimes in to make a contribution, and try to guide it onto the little paddles. It’s about 6 inches tall, and is absolutely still, no currents, no oil and gas blowing back. Now, try to do that from a mile and a half away, that’s what 5,000 feet is and guide it blind without seeing it, onto the top of something that is blowing out a stream at the calculated number I gave above, 33,250 gallons per hour. It isn’t easy, it’s like trying to perform open heart surgery, in the dark, blindfolded with a pair of remote arms trying to cap a gushing aorta.
As for any number of other solutions that anyone else has given, or come up with, there are a number of options on the table. Let me tell you that the well is in a basaltic formation, the most brittle rock known, so the thought of “blowing the well” using conventional explosives has been explored, but thrown out, as it stands the possibility of fracturing the entire dome. There is only one known explosive reaction on Earth that can generate enough heat to fuse the basalt into glass and seal it off, I’ll let your intelligence take over from there, so far that option isn’t on the table.

Now as far as what’s happening and the truly pathetic part of BP’s response, let’s take a look at the region. Understand that Plaquemines parish (a parish is a county in Louisiana) was completely wiped out by Katrina, I mean wiped off the map. I know, there’s only road down that boot, US-23, and I drive the entire length of it to the heliport every two weeks, (now every week). It hadn’t fully recovered and was still shaky, and is comprised mostly of bayous, marshes and wetlands, and is home to population, the bulk of which is shrimp and oyster fisherman and commercial fisherman. There isn’t a miraculous solution for it, these people have lost a way of life, forever. The shrimp and oyster beds will not recover, the fisheries in the Gulf will not recover. This isn’t doomsaying, it’s biological fact. The coast of Louisiana contains a full 40% of America’s wetlands, and acts as the biofilter for the Mississippi River, the brackish marshes providing the filter to keep the saltwater from intruding into the freshwater. These marshes are dead. I’m not even counting the other Gulf Coast states right now. Remember that it’s now summer all across the Nation, but come Fall, these wetlands and marshes are home to migrating ducks, cranes, herons and other migratory birds that don’t go all the way to Mexico or Central America. The dispersant that BP used also kills the microbes and bacteria that act as the foundation for the food chain in the Gulf and in the marshes. BP has hired some locals, but not many, in the clean-up effort, and is putting a gag order on them to keep them from talking in order to receive the check. Some of them, fortunately, as they see what’s happening, have walked away and are starting to talk. Please remember that just because someone has a lot of tattoos, likes to drink beer on Friday nights and says “fuck” a lot, they’re not that different than you, and in their case, they’re watching their family’s legacy and future, their own way of life being destroyed. As for the people who are doing the clean-up, BP is providing absolutely no personal protective equipment; no respirators, faceshields, or gloves; things we wouldn’t even think of handling crude oil without, and is providing no HAZMAT training; just paper coveralls. BP has already gone to court and to the U.S. Congress in order to limit their liability, cap it and their CEO has publicly said (matter of public record) “I’d like my life back”, as if this was a bother to him. I’m sure there are 11 families that would like their loved ones life back too, and countless families right now in Louisiana that would like their own lives back, which have now been irrevocably, irreversibly changed. He’s also said “People can get their shrimp and oysters from other places than Louisiana.”

Here are the things you can do, that will make a difference, and also the things that you can’t do, that won’t make any difference, and I’ll say this: there’s two types of people in the world. Talkers and Doers, and we all notice and know who the Doers are, they make a difference. All the rest? Well, all the rest is just coffee house bullshit.

- First and foremost, and most imperative, please, please, please look at your own consumption and use. It’s most likely much higher than you believe it to be. There are no “magic bullets”, no hidden things……. For now, there’s only one workable solution, that’s hybrid vehicles (or motorcycles, much better mileage) but hybrids use electricity; which brings up another dilemma, coal vs. nuclear power. That whole business about the Bakken oil field through the Midwest that is trillions of barrels and can provide oil for another century? Yup, it’s there, we just can’t get to it. It’s trapped in oil shale, and the choice there is either to strip mine the entire Midwest, bake the shale the get the oil out and put the toxic slag somewhere; or come up with the technology to insert heaters 5 miles deep into the Earth, bake the oil out at high enough temperatures to capture it, without methane, dioxane and hydrogren sulfide emissions; capture it somehow, and do it without causing underground fractures. We don’t have that technology yet. Remember that demand, verbal demand is known by another name, “opinion”. The only demand that a multi-national corporation knows, or responds to, is economic or political. I urge you to take a look at the following links and websites, first up is T. Boone Pickens, who made his fortune in oil, and knows the business inside and out, and knows that the term Peak Oil means, I strongly urge you to investigate The Pickens Plan and sign up to do what you can. The other site I highly recommend is one that is a Veteran’s organization, started by Iraq/Afghanistan veterans and laying some plain truths out about what we’re doing in the Mideast, and asking people to stop and think about what they’re doing putting young American servicepeople in harm’s way to satisfy this country’s insatiable energy needs. Called Operation Free: Securing America’s Energy Needs, it’s one that is worth your time to investigate fact and truth with……..

- Demand that BP not be allowed to put a “gag order” on it’s workers in talking to the media. This is a Constitutional First Amendment issue and is criminal, and is stopping the free flow of information about the extent of the damage already to the wetlands, the Gulf and the bayous.

My prayer? It’s that people wake up, look at their own part in it, in their own demands that contributed to it and do the right thing about it, and stop blaming everyone else, and stop waiting for someone else to do something about it.

Comments by the sender of this message: This Michael Caldis is apparently well qualified unlike our unionist trained Treasurer Swan and Finance Minister Tanner. Note: READ THIS CAREFULLY -Be afraid , be very afraid – don’t sit on your hands , my friends, get out of managed funds super, if you are contributing personally, STOP – & only apply COMPULSORY contributions to your super.!!! – PAY off your morgages faster, invest only in capital guaranteed investments – the coming AUSTRALIAN CRASH will not recover in my lifetime !!!!

Message:”Michael J. Martin” Date: 21 May 2010

A few Macquarie Bank analysts attended a breakfast meeting with Wayne Swan yesterday. Wayne Swan is the Treasurer of Australia in the First Rudd Labor Government Ministry. One of the analysts asked why the 40% “Super Profits Tax” kicks in at the long term bond rate which is currently 5.75% (that means that a company will pay this new tax on top of the company tax rate if they earn a return on investment above 5.75%). She asked why the tax did not kick in at a higher rate that was closer to a companys weighted cost of capital (normally about 10%). Anyone who has studied finance knows that a company will not invest in a new project unless that project will generate a return on investment above the company’s cost of capital. The cost of capital is the cost of the company’s funds and comprises both debt and equity (see definition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_capital).

Apparently Wayne Swan did not understand the question. Apparently Wayne Swan thought that the long term bond rate was a companys cost of capital. The Macquarie analyst then asked if Swan would rule out a super tax on banks. Wayne Swan would not answer the question directly and skirted the issue. Our analysts also worked out that this “Super Profits Tax” applies to anything dug out of the ground. That includes clay, sand, fertiliser, silica etc. It hits the fertiliser, building and construction industries. The “Super Profits Tax” is not just a tax on resources but a broad based tax which will also hurt the construction/building and housing industry and all industries where any kind of Australian natural resource is an input to the cost of production.

 

I am not normally a person to make political comments to my clients and what I am about to say are my own views and not the official Macquarie line. I have a duty to give you my honest opinion on anything that has the potential to significantly affect the markets and your investments. The governments response to the Henry Review has me deeply shocked. Our market is falling for a 3rd straight day in a row. The share market is a bellwether for the direction of the state of our economy and the market is saying to us right now that Kevin Rudd is pursuing an agenda that is going to destroy economic growth in Australia. I have listed my analysis of the Labor government’s response to the Henry Tax Review as follows:

1. If the Macquarie analyst is right Wayne Swan is financially illiterate and has demonstrable incompetence.

2. The “Super Profit Tax” title is misleading and dishonest. This is a tax on ordinary profits, not super profits. 28% Company tax is still payable along with the 40% “Super Profits” tax, i.e. both are payable at the same time on a return above the bond yield (5.75%).

3. The chart Wayne Swan showed to demonstrate that taxes paid by the resource sector were falling while mining profits were increasing excluded company tax payments. This is a dishonest manipulation of tax data designed to deceive.

4. The proposed increase in super contributions will be offset by a fall in the value of superannuation assets.

5. We can safely assume that Labor has privately considered introducing a super tax on banks, especially if taxes from resources dry up.

6. Raising taxes increases the likelihood of cost push inflation, i.e. new taxes may be passed onto consumers in the form of higher prices for products and services.

7. Foreign investors in Australia are alarmed. Australia is now seen as being a high sovereign risk destination to invest. There is a significant risk of major capital flight out of Australia.

8. Capital flight out of Australia would be disastrous for our economy. It will destroy investment, jobs and growth.

9. I saw no tax incentives in the Henry report to encourage innovation and investment in research and development into IT/medical research/ renewable energy or any other industry that could be built up to sustain our nation once the resource boom is over.

There is no incentive to make the non resource rich Australian States competitive. We will strip our natural resources to pay for our high standard of living while we fail to build the global competitiveness our nation needs when the mining boom is over.

10. I saw no attempt to divert any “super” taxes into a new Australian sovereign wealth fund that could be used to preserve the huge cyclical profits from the mining boom. A new Sovereign Wealth fund could then re-invest real super profits back into building other industries that have the potential to sustain economic growth post the mining boom. Instead all the super taxes will be spent to win votes.

11. The fall in the value of resource and resource related stocks in the last 3 days has wiped billions of dollars off the value of superannuation and is proof that foreign money is already withdrawing from Australia. An exodus of foreign capital is not something that happens overnight. It could take months to play out. The new “super profits” tax is supposed to generate $12b in 3 years. More than $12bn has been wiped of the market in 3 days.

China is trying to slow its economy down to prevent its economy from bursting as it overheats. Every week we are seeing the Chinese tighten money supply to slow themselves down. Now is not a time to destroy the resource sector while China is at risk of tapping the breaks too hard and slowing itself down too fast.

The big winner out of this will be the US markets. Stocks with strong $US earnings will benefit from a falling $A while money comes out of this country. Stocks like CSL, WDC, QBE, NWS, JHX will benefit and defensives like WOW and WES will be supported too.

If the current government of Australia persists in pursuing its agenda as laid out by its response to the Henry Review then I think the only thing that will save Australia from a serious economic slowdown in the next 2 years will be a change of government at the next general election later this year.

Before acting on anything in this email please call me first .

 

Regards, Michael Caldis

Senior Investment Adviser Macquarie Equities Limited

Macquarie Private Wealth

FER DE LANCE – SOVIET SCALAR WEAPONS by Tom Beardon $45 + post – Order from Nutech2000 by email

 

Have you ever wondered what is really going on behind the scenes during what the mass media calls “Nuclear Disarmament” talks?

Such as the recent U.S./ Russian agreement, and the following Disarmament Summit?

Why the fixation on 60 year old technology?

Well, a pretty good primer is to go back to Tom Bearden’s 1988 Classic video “Secret Superweapons that Drive Disarmament Negotiations,” ironically, delivered at a Conference at the World Trade Center in New York City. This lays out in intricate detail the full gamut of Tesla electrogravitic/ scalar and biological weapons that “the bad guys” have under their control. Although this lecture was recorded in 1988, it is a sure bet that these technologies have not just disappeared, nor are they solely in the hands of the Russians any more. And the roots of the current advanced iterations of these weapons are to be found in this seminal lecture.

But the use of the code phrase “nuclear disarmament” is to mask the existence of these superweapons that are being used in the secret wars that are now being waged every day by numerous protagonists all around us.

We are pleased to announce that this classic video has been newly re-mastered, and has also been updated with archival and contemporary slides and video footage from Tom Bearden’s and other correspondent’s historical collections, and is available from the DVD Foundations section of the Tom Bearden online store at

http://cheniere.org/sales/online-store.htm

You owe it to yourself and to your kin to brief yourselves on these Superweapons which are now being used on a daily basis, hopefully for purely defensive purposes, but indicators are otherwise.

Regards

Tony Craddock
Web Administrator
The Tom Bearden Website
www.cheniere.org

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT FOR JUSTICE – speeding,parking,tolls……