I herewith beg you to seriously review your answers to the question of the IPCC being in control, directing companies to make corrections to emissions of Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) by taxing companies on this supposed emission claim.

There is professional evidence to show that CO₂ cannot produce significant amounts of heat in our atmosphere.

What in the world are they spraying? -  By Michael J. Murphy.  Three weeks ago I was given a DVD by Mr Ray Rabanin of M & R Group Ltd.  This DVD has enough proof to show that there is a world conspiracy in poisoning many designated nations of the world to the belief that they are saving the world from Global Warming.  In fact our Earth is being bombarded between 10 to 20 Million tonnes of Aluminium into our atmosphere, which is poisoning the countryside.  When applying this prime element, and pumped into our atmosphere as an additive to Jet Fuel to cool down the Earth’s surface.  They have not taken the time to finally test their research program, for they have been poisoning the Earth over the last six year.   From snow analysis taken from Mount CHASTA (USA) showed excessive amounts of: Aluminium ug/1 at 61,100 parts per million, Barium 83 parts per million and Strontium with 383 parts per million.  It is obvious that these analyses results are sixteen times over the acceptable limits for human consumption.

The observed information in Geelong to register the chemical elements within our rain fall is observing sulphide sediment from local rains over the past twelve months initiating that there is something going on here, too.  From my record of observed jet trails photographed with a digital camera, show these same jets Chem-trail phenomena that is portrayed on this DVD, we in Australia should be asking.  “What are we being sprayed with?”; “Who is authorizing this?”, and “Why is this allowed in our Australian skies?”  We are slowly being poisoned.  In the United States of America and Hawaii, earth analyses is shown to be at a very low ph level, as it is killing plant growth, aged trees to a point that they cannot survive because of the toxic coatings on their leaves, stopping the natural synthesis cycle to absorb Carbon Dioxide.  No wonder the science is saying that Carbon Dioxide is rising.

It is my belief that these scientific researchers are indeed on the wrong tram line and should be stopped by public demand of our Human rights to occupy the air space that our creator has given to us all.

In fact, there is a greater influence where by adding Aluminium, Barium and Strontium into the mixture of aero Jet fuels, initiates a small amount of heat loss on the Earth’s surface.  This practice has just been unveiled in Australia and the base reason of why this is happening is that it reflects the Sun’s Heat Rays by a factor of some 16 : 1 from entering the surface of the Earth. This practice has been accomplished to stop Global Warming. BUT:

This practice has been asked to a Royal Society member, Mr David Keith who is associated to the University of Calgary.  USA.  He was questioned by Michael J Murphy the editor of: “What in the world are they spraying? and asked.  “So let me clarify.  10 Megatons of Aluminium is diminished into the atmosphere would have no human, health impact?”  David Keith answered “We have not done any research of any serious Aluminium in this area and we could find something terrible that we find tomorrow that we haven’t looked at.”

I now ask you to look seriously at this next part of this interview.  On Mount CHASTA in the USA, scientists Francis Mangels – USDA Biologist has associated Jet Aircraft Trail Tests deposits on this snow covered mountain with this following analysis:  Aluminium ug/1 = 61,100 parts per million: Barium 83 ug/1 = 83 parts per million and Strontium ug/1 383 parts per million.   This is well over acceptable values for snow (H2O) as this snow coverage has been poisoned by these chem.-jet trails, droppings.

I have records of rain falling in Bell Post Hill that show a similar observation of these chemicals.

Already a patent has been taken out to overcome this: Aluminium Resistant Gene Patent #7582809, Granted 1st September 2009 and developed by the Cornel University in Ithaca-New York.  Are they not closing the back door by assuring that their farmers will have to buy this gene to plant crops that are now being killed off by this high aluminium particles reading, as discussed above?

Again, I beg you to seriously consider your thoughts about the claimed, so called Climate Change being caused by Humans.  Now that this climate is a natural event and that our Earth is passing through a Positive Heliosphere sector as my book shows conclusively, showing our environment will again change on or near the 22 December 2012 when our Earth enters again another twenty six thousand year cycle and when we will again experience another eleven year cycle in this new Negative Heliosphere event.

Mr G. Edwards Griffin – Geologist who has stated that the spraying appears to be over NATO countries, such as, North West Africa, Wales, Scotland, Switzland, Turkey, Scotland, China, France, and Canada. (And in Australia, but not positively proven)  It is politically motivated.  It must be stopped.  Follow the Money and you will find the source.

My book: Climate Change-Explained by Magnetism has been acclaimed by several science personnel in Australia and England and I ask you again to take a step back to review the information that has been presented to you via the IPCC and the Australian Government and ask. Have they shown me the true extent to how Carbon Dioxide is capable of changing our Earth’s Atmosphere?  When you find that there is no such answer, and then maybe you will ask:  What have we been fed to believe that Humans are responsible?  When you find out that it is the Governments are using this scheme to apply a taxation to gain them payment of the huge expenses that they have accumulated over the last few years.

Thomas T S Watson

Send article as PDF to

Al Gore’s Nine Lies Written by Investor’s Business Daily | 24 February 2010 newsweek gore The godfather of climate hysteria is in hiding as another of his wild claims unravels — this one about global warming causing seas to swallow us up. We’ve not seen or heard much of the former vice president, Oscar winner and Nobel Prize recipient recently as the case for disastrous man-made climate change collapses. Perhaps he’s off reading how scientists were forced to withdraw a study on a projected sea level rise due to global warming after finding two “technical” mistakes that undermined the findings. The study, published in 2009 in Nature Geoscience, allegedly confirmed the conclusions of the 2007 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that sea levels would rise due to climate change. The IPCC put the rise at 59 centimeters by 2100. The Nature Geoscience study put it at up to 82 centimeters. Many considered the study and the IPCC’s estimates too conservative in their warnings. After all, Al Gore, in his award-winning opus, “An Inconvenient Truth,” laughingly called a documentary, foretold an apocalyptic vision of the devastation caused by a 20-foot rise in sea levels due to melting polar ice caps “in the near future.” Now Mark Siddall, from the Earth Sciences Department at England’s University of Bristol, has formally retracted the study. “One mistake was a miscalculation; the other was not to allow fully for temperature change over the past 2,000 years,” he said. According to Siddall, “People make mistakes, and mistakes happen in science.” They seem to be happening a lot lately, and more than just mistakes. We are talking about outright fraud, the deliberate manipulation and destruction of data. Last November, Al Gore was hailed by Newsweek as “The Thinking Man’s Thinking Man.” Since then we and he have been given much to think about, starting with the damning e-mails from researchers associated with the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Britain. The e-mails revealed an organized attempt to “hide the decline” in global temperatures, to manipulate data to fit preconceived conclusions, and to discredit and shun reputable skeptics. A key finding of the IPCC, which along with Al Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, was revealed last month to be utterly bogus. The IPCC claimed glaciers in the Himalayas would likely disappear by 2035. The only thing they had to back it up was a 1999 non-peer reviewed article in an Indian mass-market science magazine. It’s been revealed that researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have been systematically eliminating weather stations, with a clear bias toward removing colder latitude and altitude locations. The number of reporting stations in Canada dropped from 600 to 35, with only one station used by the NOAA as a temperature gauge for Canadian territory above the Arctic Circle. The past is prologue. Two years ago, Justice Michael Burton of London’s High Court ruled Gore’s film could be shown in British schools only if material explaining its errors were included in the curriculum. Burton documented nine significant errors in Gore’s film and wrote that some of Gore’s claims arose from “alarmism and exaggeration.” The first error Gore made, according to Burton, was in his apocalyptic vision of the devastation caused by a rise in sea levels caused by melting polar ice caps. Burton wrote that Gore’s predicted 20-foot rise could occur “only after, and over, millennia” and to suggest otherwise “is not in line with the scientific consensus.” One by one, Gore’s prophecies of doom and those of the climate charlatans he inspired are being exposed as the work of con artists. From the CRU to the IPCC, the climate dominoes are falling one by one. His silence speaks volumes. Goodnight, Mr. Gore, wherever you are. Source

Send article as PDF to

Letter to the Editor

I am in agreement, our climate is changing; it changed because of our Sun’s Heliosphere reversal on the 15^th. February 2001’

This reversal directly affected our Earth’s Magnetosphere and our atmosphere has changed the barometric pressures. Last year on the 1^st. June 2009, we experienced a High over Australia of 1041millibars and a Low of 1016mb. While on the 7^th. February 2009, we experienced a Low of 996mb and a High of 1016mb. (The latter here are winter barometric readings, not summer)

Experiencing these Highs in winter brought about the drought condition, forcing clouds to a higher altitude, while in summer the clouds flowed at a much lower altitude, bringing heavy rain..

155mm/M² of rain fell in Bell Post Hill, Geelong since December 1^st, 2009 to now. This is almost 1mm/M² per day. There is no drought here.

Our Corio Bay has not been inundated with rising waters and overpowering our beautiful City by the Bay concept. Temperatures here during summer were cooler because of the effects of the rainy conditions we endured, while during winter, it was substantially warmer with little rain.

In the northern hemisphere, the same overall effect is occurring during their seasons and I understand why scientists are deeply concerned. In their signed testimony letter saying that the Earth is warming they have not considered the Sun’s Influence to initiate climate change, (They have not heard of me.) the barometric pressures indirectly affecting cloud altitudes. Instead, they looked for the Al Gore excuse that it is human activity and industrial gas production of Carbon Dioxide is to blame.

Carbon Dioxide will continue to rise for at least another 100 odd years and humans will never stop this from happening. Rising and falling Carbon Dioxide emissions is a cyclic format for over 400,000 years. The Russian Scientist, Professor Vostock proved at the Arctic and Antarctic study of Ice Cores that Carbon Dioxide is a natural cycle and follows the rise and fall of the Earth’s temperature by some 180 to 800 years, every 120,000 odd years happens. We are about to end this cycle, soon.

I need a commercial news paper to take me seriously, and say: Our Sun decides our weather, for it has since the beginning of recorded time.

Thomas T. S. Watson: (Author of: Climate Change-Explained by Magnetism?)

ISBN 978-0-646-47722-0

32 Kinlock Street

Bell Post Hill

Geelong 3215

Send article as PDF to

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=165345

—————

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room

Posted By: CrystalRiver
Date: Sunday, 24-Jan-2010 11:35:38

Glacier Meltdown: Another Scientific Scandal Involving the IPCC Climate Research Group

By F. William Engdahl

URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17155

Global Research, January 23, 2010

Only days after the failed Copenhagen Global Warming Summit, yet a new scandal over the scientific accuracy of the UN IPCC 2007 climate report has emerged. Following the major data-manipulation scandals from the UN-tied research center at Britain’s East Anglia University late 2009, the picture emerges of one of the most massive scientific frauds of recent history.

Senior members of the UN climate project, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have been forced to admit a major error in the 2007 IPCC UN report that triggered the recent global campaign for urgent measures to reduce “manmade emissions” of CO2. The IPCC’s 2007 report stated, “glaciers in the Himalayas are receding faster than in any other part of the world.” Given that this is the world’s highest mountain range and meltdown implies a massive flooding of India, China and the entire Asian region, it was a major scare “selling point” for the IPCC agenda. As well, the statement on the glacier melt in the 2007 IPCC report contains other serious errors such as the statement that “Its total area will likely shrink from the present 500,000 to 100,000 square kilometers by the year 2035.” There are only 33,000 square kilometers of glaciers in the Himalayas. And a table in the report says that between 1845 and 1965, the Pindari Glacier shrank by 2,840 meters. Then comes a math mistake: It says that’s a rate of 135.2 meters a year, when it really is only 23.5 meters a year. Now scientists around the world are scouring the entire IPCC report for indications of similar lack of scientific rigor.

It emerges that the basis of the stark IPCC glacier meltdown statement of 2007 was not even a scientific study of melting data. Rather it was a reference to a newspaper article cited by a pro-global warming ecological advocacy group, WWF.

The original source of the IPCC statement, it turns out, appeared in a 1999 report in the British magazine, New Scientist that was cited in passing by WWF. The New Scientist author, Fred Pierce, wrote then, “The inclusion of this statement has angered many glaciologists, who regard it as unjustified. Vijay Raina, a leading Indian glaciologist, wrote in a paper published by the Indian Government in November that there is no sign of “abnormal” retreat in Himalayan glaciers. India’s environment minister, Jairam Ramesh, accused the IPCC of being “alarmist.” The IPCC’s chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, has hit back, denouncing the Indian government report as “voodoo science” lacking peer review. He adds that “we have a very clear idea of what is happening” in the Himalayas.” [1]

The same Pachauri, co-awardee of the Nobel Prize with Al Gore, has recently been under attack for huge conflicts of interest related to his business interests that profit from the CO2 global warming agenda he promotes.[2]

Pearce notes that the original claim made by Indian glaciologist Syed Hasnain, in a 1999 email interview with Pearce, namely that all the glaciers in the central and eastern Himalayas could disappear by 2035, never was repeated by Hasnain in any peer-reviewed scientific journal, and that Hasnain now says the remark was “speculative”.

Despite the lack of scientific validation, the 10-year-old claim ended up in the IPCC fourth assessment report published in 2007. Moreover the claim was extrapolated to include all glaciers in the Himalayas.

Since publication of the latest New Scientist article, the IPCC officially has been forced to issue the following statement: “the IPCC said the paragraph “refers to poorly substantiated estimates of rate of recession and date for the disappearance of Himalayan glaciers. In drafting the paragraph in question, the clear and well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC procedures, were not applied properly.”

The IPCC adds, “The IPCC regrets the poor application of well-established IPCC procedures in this instance.” But the statement calls for no action beyond stating a need for absolute adherence to IPCC quality control processes. “We reaffirm our strong commitment to ensuring this level of performance,” the statement said.” [3]

In an indication of the defensiveness prevailing within the UN’s IPCC, Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, vice-chair of the IPCC, insists that the mistake did nothing to undermine the large body of evidence that showed the climate was warming and that human activity was largely to blame. He told BBC News: “I don’t see how one mistake in a 3,000-page report can damage the credibility of the overall report.”

Some serious scientists disagree. Georg Kaser, an expert in glaciology with University of Innsbruck in Austria and a lead author for the IPCC, gave a damning different assessment of the implications of the latest scandal affecting the credibility of the IPCC. Kaser says he had warned that the 2035 prediction was clearly wrong in 2006, months before the IPCC report was published. “This [date] is not just a little bit wrong, but far out of any order of magnitude. All the responsible people are aware of this weakness in the fourth assessment. All are aware of the mistakes made. If it had not been the focus of so much public opinion, we would have said ‘we will do better next time’. It is clear now that working group II has to be restructured.” [4]

The chairman of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, has made no personal comment on the glacier claim. It appears he is as well shaken by the wave of recent scandals. He told a conference in Dubai on energy recently, “They can’t attack the science so they attack the chairman. But they won’t sink me. I am the unsinkable Molly Brown (sic). In fact, I will float much higher,” he told the Guardian. His remarks suggest more the ‘spirit of Woodstock’ in 1969 than of what is supposed to be the world’s leading climate authority.

F. William Engdahl is the author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order

Notes

[1] Fred Pearce, Debate heats up over IPCC melting glaciers claim, 11 January 2010, accessed in http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18363-debate-heats-up-over-ipcc-melting-glaciers-claim.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news.

[2] F. William Engdahl, UN IPCC Climate Change chief in Conflict of Interest Scandal, December 27, 2009.

[3] Seth Borenstein, UN climate report riddled with errors on glaciers, AP, January 20, 2010.

[4] Ibid.

Please support Global Research
Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers.

Aticles In This Thread

* NEW: Glacier Meltdown: Another Scientific Scandal Involving the IPCC Climate Research Group (views: 192)
CrystalRiver — Sunday, 24-Jan-2010 11:35:38

o NEW: Glacier Meltdown: WWF BACKS AWAY FROM ITS EARLIER STAND
hobie — Sunday, 24-Jan-2010 17:49:31

Send article as PDF to